↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic disturbances connecting obesity and depression

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic disturbances connecting obesity and depression
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecile Hryhorczuk, Sandeep Sharma, Stephanie E. Fulton

Abstract

Obesity markedly increases the odds of developing depression. Depressed mood not only impairs motivation, quality of life and overall functioning but also increases the risks of obesity complications. Abdominal obesity is a better predictor of depression and anxiety risk than overall adipose mass. A growing amount of research suggests that metabolic abnormalities stemming from central obesity that lead to metabolic disease may also be responsible for the increased incidence of depression in obesity. As reviewed here, a higher mass of dysfunctional adipose tissue is associated with several metabolic disturbances that are either directly or indirectly implicated in the control of emotions and mood. To better comprehend the development of depression in obesity, this review pulls together select findings addressing the link between adiposity, diet and negative emotional states and discusses the evidence that alterations in glucocorticoids, adipose-derived hormones, insulin and inflammatory signaling that are characteristic of central obesity may be involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 347 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 15%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Master 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 84 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 14%
Neuroscience 36 10%
Psychology 24 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 96 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,133,323
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#494
of 11,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,225
of 291,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#17
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.