↓ Skip to main content

Real-time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
526 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief network
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter O'Connor, Daniel Neil, Shih-Chii Liu, Tobi Delbruck, Michael Pfeiffer

Abstract

Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) have recently shown impressive performance on a broad range of classification problems. Their generative properties allow better understanding of the performance, and provide a simpler solution for sensor fusion tasks. However, because of their inherent need for feedback and parallel update of large numbers of units, DBNs are expensive to implement on serial computers. This paper proposes a method based on the Siegert approximation for Integrate-and-Fire neurons to map an offline-trained DBN onto an efficient event-driven spiking neural network suitable for hardware implementation. The method is demonstrated in simulation and by a real-time implementation of a 3-layer network with 2694 neurons used for visual classification of MNIST handwritten digits with input from a 128 × 128 Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS) silicon retina, and sensory-fusion using additional input from a 64-channel AER-EAR silicon cochlea. The system is implemented through the open-source software in the jAER project and runs in real-time on a laptop computer. It is demonstrated that the system can recognize digits in the presence of distractions, noise, scaling, translation and rotation, and that the degradation of recognition performance by using an event-based approach is less than 1%. Recognition is achieved in an average of 5.8 ms after the onset of the presentation of a digit. By cue integration from both silicon retina and cochlea outputs we show that the system can be biased to select the correct digit from otherwise ambiguous input.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 5 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 501 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 27%
Student > Master 103 20%
Researcher 64 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 75 14%
Unknown 84 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 168 32%
Engineering 160 30%
Neuroscience 27 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Physics and Astronomy 13 2%
Other 47 9%
Unknown 94 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,393,804
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,677
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,931
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#57
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.