↓ Skip to main content

GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kendrick N. Kay, Ariel Rokem, Jonathan Winawer, Robert F. Dougherty, Brian A. Wandell

Abstract

In task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), researchers seek to measure fMRI signals related to a given task or condition. In many circumstances, measuring this signal of interest is limited by noise. In this study, we present GLMdenoise, a technique that improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by entering noise regressors into a general linear model (GLM) analysis of fMRI data. The noise regressors are derived by conducting an initial model fit to determine voxels unrelated to the experimental paradigm, performing principal components analysis (PCA) on the time-series of these voxels, and using cross-validation to select the optimal number of principal components to use as noise regressors. Due to the use of data resampling, GLMdenoise requires and is best suited for datasets involving multiple runs (where conditions repeat across runs). We show that GLMdenoise consistently improves cross-validation accuracy of GLM estimates on a variety of event-related experimental datasets and is accompanied by substantial gains in SNR. To promote practical application of methods, we provide MATLAB code implementing GLMdenoise. Furthermore, to help compare GLMdenoise to other denoising methods, we present the Denoise Benchmark (DNB), a public database and architecture for evaluating denoising methods. The DNB consists of the datasets described in this paper, a code framework that enables automatic evaluation of a denoising method, and implementations of several denoising methods, including GLMdenoise, the use of motion parameters as noise regressors, ICA-based denoising, and RETROICOR/RVHRCOR. Using the DNB, we find that GLMdenoise performs best out of all of the denoising methods we tested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Canada 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 303 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 24%
Researcher 65 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Master 24 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 57 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 80 25%
Psychology 71 22%
Engineering 23 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Computer Science 16 5%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 75 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,061,235
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,076
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,555
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#50
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.