↓ Skip to main content

Art reaches within: aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
49 X users
facebook
27 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Art reaches within: aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward A. Vessel, G. Gabrielle Starr, Nava Rubin

Abstract

In a task of rating images of artworks in an fMRI scanner, regions in the medial prefrontal cortex that are known to be part of the default mode network (DMN) were positively activated on the highest-rated trials. This is surprising given the DMN's original characterization as the set of brain regions that show greater fMRI activity during rest periods than during performance of tasks requiring focus on external stimuli. But further research showed that DMN regions could be positively activated also in structured tasks, if those tasks involved self-referential thought or self-relevant information. How may our findings be understood in this context? Although our task had no explicit self-referential aspect and the stimuli had no a priori self-relevance to the observers, the experimental design we employed emphasized the personal aspects of aesthetic experience. Observers were told that we were interested in their individual tastes, and asked to base their ratings on how much each artwork "moved" them. Moreover, we used little-known artworks that covered a wide range of styles, which led to high individual variability: each artwork was rated highly by some observers and poorly by others. This means that rating-specific neural responses cannot be attributed to the features of any particular artworks, but rather to the aesthetic experience itself. The DMN activity therefore suggests that certain artworks, albeit unfamiliar, may be so well-matched to an individual's unique makeup that they obtain access to the neural substrates concerned with the self-access which other external stimuli normally do not get. This mediates a sense of being "moved," or "touched from within." This account is consistent with the modern notion that individuals' taste in art is linked with their sense of identity, and suggests that DMN activity may serve to signal "self-relevance" in a broader sense than has been thought so far.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 271 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Researcher 46 16%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Other 60 21%
Unknown 43 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 32%
Neuroscience 45 16%
Arts and Humanities 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 53 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#386,345
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#166
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,603
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.