↓ Skip to main content

Activity in dlPFC and its effective connectivity to vmPFC are associated with temporal discounting

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activity in dlPFC and its effective connectivity to vmPFC are associated with temporal discounting
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd A. Hare, Shabnam Hakimi, Antonio Rangel

Abstract

There is widespread interest in identifying computational and neurobiological mechanisms that influence the ability to choose long-term benefits over more proximal and readily available rewards in domains such as dietary and economic choice. We present the results of a human fMRI study that examines how neural activity relates to observed individual differences in the discounting of future rewards during an intertemporal monetary choice task. We found that a region of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) BA-46 was more active in trials where subjects chose delayed rewards, after controlling for the subjective value of those rewards. We also found that the connectivity from dlPFC BA-46 to a region of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) widely associated with the computation of stimulus values, increased at the time of choice, and especially during trials in which subjects chose delayed rewards. Finally, we found that estimates of effective connectivity between these two regions played a critical role in predicting out-of-sample, between-subject differences in discount rates. Together with previous findings in dietary choice, these results suggest that a common set of computational and neurobiological mechanisms facilitate choices in favor of long-term reward in both settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 281 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 30%
Student > Master 36 12%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 35%
Neuroscience 54 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 65 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,510,866
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#722
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,616
of 249,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.