↓ Skip to main content

NG2 cells (polydendrocytes) in brain physiology and repair

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NG2 cells (polydendrocytes) in brain physiology and repair
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akiko Nishiyama, Ryusuke Suzuki, Xiaoqin Zhu

Abstract

NG2 cells, also referred to as oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) or polydendrocytes, represent a major resident glial cell population that is distinct from mature astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and neural stem cells and exist throughout the gray and white matter of the developing and mature central nervous system (CNS). While their most established fate is the oligodendrocyte, they retain lineage plasticity in an age- and region-specific manner. During development, they contribute to 36% of protoplasmic astrocytes in the ventral forebrain. Despite intense investigation on the neuronal fate of NG2 cells, there is no definitive evidence that they contribute substantially to the neuronal population. NG2 cells have attributes that suggest that they have functions other than to generate oligodendrocytes, but their exact role in the neural network remains unknown. Under pathological states, NG2 cells not only contribute to myelin repair, but they become activated in response to a wide variety of insults and could play a primary role in pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 177 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 24%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 27%
Neuroscience 46 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,668
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,613
of 242,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#86
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.