You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2014.00179 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina D. Fuller, John J. Galvin, Bert Maat, Rolien H. Free, Deniz Başkent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,086
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,011
of 241,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#54
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.