↓ Skip to main content

Brain-like associative learning using a nanoscale non-volatile phase change synaptic device array

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain-like associative learning using a nanoscale non-volatile phase change synaptic device array
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sukru B. Eryilmaz, Duygu Kuzum, Rakesh Jeyasingh, SangBum Kim, Matthew BrightSky, Chung Lam, H.-S. Philip Wong

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroscience together with nanoscale electronic device technology have resulted in huge interests in realizing brain-like computing hardwares using emerging nanoscale memory devices as synaptic elements. Although there has been experimental work that demonstrated the operation of nanoscale synaptic element at the single device level, network level studies have been limited to simulations. In this work, we demonstrate, using experiments, array level associative learning using phase change synaptic devices connected in a grid like configuration similar to the organization of the biological brain. Implementing Hebbian learning with phase change memory cells, the synaptic grid was able to store presented patterns and recall missing patterns in an associative brain-like fashion. We found that the system is robust to device variations, and large variations in cell resistance states can be accommodated by increasing the number of training epochs. We illustrated the tradeoff between variation tolerance of the network and the overall energy consumption, and found that energy consumption is decreased significantly for lower variation tolerance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 152 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 34%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 66 41%
Physics and Astronomy 20 12%
Materials Science 13 8%
Computer Science 12 7%
Chemistry 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,574
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,927
of 239,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#42
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.