↓ Skip to main content

Errare machinale est: the use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Errare machinale est: the use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Chavarriaga, Aleksander Sobolewski, José del R. Millán

Abstract

The ability to recognize errors is crucial for efficient behavior. Numerous studies have identified electrophysiological correlates of error recognition in the human brain (error-related potentials, ErrPs). Consequently, it has been proposed to use these signals to improve human-computer interaction (HCI) or brain-machine interfacing (BMI). Here, we present a review of over a decade of developments toward this goal. This body of work provides consistent evidence that ErrPs can be successfully detected on a single-trial basis, and that they can be effectively used in both HCI and BMI applications. We first describe the ErrP phenomenon and follow up with an analysis of different strategies to increase the robustness of a system by incorporating single-trial ErrP recognition, either by correcting the machine's actions or by providing means for its error-based adaptation. These approaches can be applied both when the user employs traditional HCI input devices or in combination with another BMI channel. Finally, we discuss the current challenges that have to be overcome in order to fully integrate ErrPs into practical applications. This includes, in particular, the characterization of such signals during real(istic) applications, as well as the possibility of extracting richer information from them, going beyond the time-locked decoding that dominates current approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 247 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 26%
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 92 35%
Neuroscience 37 14%
Computer Science 31 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Psychology 12 5%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 59 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,871,964
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#992
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,340
of 239,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.