You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primate comparative neuroscience using magnetic resonance imaging: promises and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2014.00298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rogier B. Mars, Franz-Xaver Neubert, Lennart Verhagen, Jérôme Sallet, Karla L. Miller, Robin I. M. Dunbar, Robert A. Barton |
| Abstract |
Primate comparative anatomy is an established field that has made rich and substantial contributions to neuroscience. However, the labor-intensive techniques employed mean that most comparisons are often based on a small number of species, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. In this review we explore how new developments in magnetic resonance imaging have the potential to apply comparative neuroscience to a much wider range of species, allowing it to realize an even greater potential. We discuss (1) new advances in the types of data that can be acquired, (2) novel methods for extracting meaningful measures from such data that can be compared between species, and (3) methods to analyse these measures within a phylogenetic framework. Together these developments will allow researchers to characterize the relationship between different brains, the ecological niche they occupy, and the behavior they produce in more detail than ever before. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 27% |
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 26 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 21% |
| Psychology | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,233
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,440
of 267,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#34
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.