You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sonification as a possible stroke rehabilitation strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2014.00332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel S. Scholz, Liming Wu, Jonas Pirzer, Johann Schneider, Jens D. Rollnik, Michael Großbach, Eckart O. Altenmüller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,065
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,669
of 272,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#88
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.