↓ Skip to main content

Cortical connective field estimates from resting state fMRI activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical connective field estimates from resting state fMRI activity
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolás Gravel, Ben Harvey, Barbara Nordhjem, Koen V. Haak, Serge O. Dumoulin, Remco Renken, Branislava Ćurčić-Blake, Frans W. Cornelissen

Abstract

One way to study connectivity in visual cortical areas is by examining spontaneous neural activity. In the absence of visual input, such activity remains shaped by the underlying neural architecture and, presumably, may still reflect visuotopic organization. Here, we applied population connective field (CF) modeling to estimate the spatial profile of functional connectivity in the early visual cortex during resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI). This model-based analysis estimates the spatial integration between blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals in distinct cortical visual field maps using fMRI. Just as population receptive field (pRF) mapping predicts the collective neural activity in a voxel as a function of response selectivity to stimulus position in visual space, CF modeling predicts the activity of voxels in one visual area as a function of the aggregate activity in voxels in another visual area. In combination with pRF mapping, CF locations on the cortical surface can be interpreted in visual space, thus enabling reconstruction of visuotopic maps from resting state data. We demonstrate that V1 ➤ V2 and V1 ➤ V3 CF maps estimated from resting state fMRI data show visuotopic organization. Therefore, we conclude that-despite some variability in CF estimates between RS scans-neural properties such as CF maps and CF size can be derived from resting state data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 29%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 24%
Psychology 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Engineering 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,846,763
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,427
of 11,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,793
of 274,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#42
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.