↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian Action

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bayesian Action&Perception: Representing the World in the Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald E Loeb, Jeremy A Fishel

Abstract

Theories of perception seek to explain how sensory data are processed to identify previously experienced objects, but they usually do not consider the decisions and effort that goes into acquiring the sensory data. Identification of objects according to their tactile properties requires active exploratory movements. The sensory data thereby obtained depend on the details of those movements, which human subjects change rapidly and seemingly capriciously. Bayesian Exploration is an algorithm that uses prior experience to decide which next exploratory movement should provide the most useful data to disambiguate the most likely possibilities. In previous studies, a simple robot equipped with a biomimetic tactile sensor and operated according to Bayesian Exploration performed in a manner similar to and actually better than humans on a texture identification task. Expanding on this, "Bayesian Action&Perception" refers to the construction and querying of an associative memory of previously experienced entities containing both sensory data and the motor programs that elicited them. We hypothesize that this memory can be queried (i) to identify useful next exploratory movements during identification of an unknown entity ("action for perception") or (ii) to characterize whether an unknown entity is fit for purpose ("perception for action") or (iii) to recall what actions might be feasible for a known entity (Gibsonian affordance). The biomimetic design of this mechatronic system may provide insights into the neuronal basis of biological action and perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 138 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 32%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 9 6%
Student > Master 8 5%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 33 21%
Psychology 25 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Computer Science 19 12%
Neuroscience 15 10%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,882,900
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,001
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,522
of 274,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#12
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.