You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Morphological elucidation of basal ganglia circuits contributing reward prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fumino Fujiyama, Susumu Takahashi, Fuyuki Karube |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 29% |
| Researcher | 24 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 31 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 27% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,645,596
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,577
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,953
of 360,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#38
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.