You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reinforcement learning for adaptive threshold control of restorative brain-computer interfaces: a Bayesian simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Bauer, Alireza Gharabaghi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 12% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,085
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,592
of 367,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#80
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.