↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity in memristive devices for spiking neural networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasticity in memristive devices for spiking neural networks
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvain Saïghi, Christian G. Mayr, Teresa Serrano-Gotarredona, Heidemarie Schmidt, Gwendal Lecerf, Jean Tomas, Julie Grollier, Sören Boyn, Adrien F. Vincent, Damien Querlioz, Selina La Barbera, Fabien Alibart, Dominique Vuillaume, Olivier Bichler, Christian Gamrat, Bernabé Linares-Barranco

Abstract

Memristive devices present a new device technology allowing for the realization of compact non-volatile memories. Some of them are already in the process of industrialization. Additionally, they exhibit complex multilevel and plastic behaviors, which make them good candidates for the implementation of artificial synapses in neuromorphic engineering. However, memristive effects rely on diverse physical mechanisms, and their plastic behaviors differ strongly from one technology to another. Here, we present measurements performed on different memristive devices and the opportunities that they provide. We show that they can be used to implement different learning rules whose properties emerge directly from device physics: real time or accelerated operation, deterministic or stochastic behavior, long term or short term plasticity. We then discuss how such devices might be integrated into a complete architecture. These results highlight that there is no unique way to exploit memristive devices in neuromorphic systems. Understanding and embracing device physics is the key for their optimal use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 262 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 21%
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 62 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 77 28%
Physics and Astronomy 41 15%
Materials Science 33 12%
Computer Science 14 5%
Chemistry 11 4%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 71 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,958,608
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,067
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,220
of 271,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#18
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.