You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes of social exclusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taishi Kawamoto, Mitsuhiro Ura, Hiroshi Nittono |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 40% |
| Colombia | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 74 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,674
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,610
of 273,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#52
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.