↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the rules of the road: proteomic approaches to interrogate the blood brain barrier

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the rules of the road: proteomic approaches to interrogate the blood brain barrier
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce E. Torbett, Andrew Baird, Brian P. Eliceiri

Abstract

The blood brain barrier (BBB) is often regarded as a passive barrier that protects brain parenchyma from toxic substances, circulating leukocytes, while allowing the passage of selected molecules. Recently, a combination of molecular profiling techniques have characterized the constituents of the BBB based on in vitro models using isolated endothelial cells and ex vivo models analyzing isolated blood vessels. Characterization of gene expression profiles that are specific to the endothelium of brain blood vessels, and the identification of proteins, cells and multi-cellular structure that comprise the BBB have led to a emerging consensus that the BBB is not, in and of itself, a simple barrier of specialized endothelial cells. Instead, regulation of transcytosis, permeability, and drug translocation into the central nervous system is now viewed as a collection of neurovascular units (NVUs) that, together, give the BBB its unique biological properties. We will review recent technology advancing the understanding of the molecular basis of the BBB with a focus on proteomic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Engineering 6 12%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,065,584
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,284
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,134
of 272,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#72
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.