↓ Skip to main content

Brain-to-text: decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 11,538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain-to-text: decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Herff, Dominic Heger, Adriana de Pesters, Dominic Telaar, Peter Brunner, Gerwin Schalk, Tanja Schultz

Abstract

It has long been speculated whether communication between humans and machines based on natural speech related cortical activity is possible. Over the past decade, studies have suggested that it is feasible to recognize isolated aspects of speech from neural signals, such as auditory features, phones or one of a few isolated words. However, until now it remained an unsolved challenge to decode continuously spoken speech from the neural substrate associated with speech and language processing. Here, we show for the first time that continuously spoken speech can be decoded into the expressed words from intracranial electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings.Specifically, we implemented a system, which we call Brain-To-Text that models single phones, employs techniques from automatic speech recognition (ASR), and thereby transforms brain activity while speaking into the corresponding textual representation. Our results demonstrate that our system can achieve word error rates as low as 25% and phone error rates below 50%. Additionally, our approach contributes to the current understanding of the neural basis of continuous speech production by identifying those cortical regions that hold substantial information about individual phones. In conclusion, the Brain-To-Text system described in this paper represents an important step toward human-machine communication based on imagined speech.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 348 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 20%
Researcher 60 16%
Student > Master 55 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Professor 21 6%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 54 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 73 20%
Neuroscience 66 18%
Computer Science 50 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 7%
Psychology 20 5%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 78 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 494. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#52,861
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#20
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#474
of 278,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.