↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine in socioecological and evolutionary perspectives: implications for psychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dopamine in socioecological and evolutionary perspectives: implications for psychiatric disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshie Yamaguchi, Young-A Lee, Yukiori Goto

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) transmission in brain areas such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAcc) plays important roles in cognitive and affective function. As such, DA deficits have been implicated in a number of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Accumulating evidence suggests that DA is also involved in social behavior of animals and humans. Although most animals organize and live in social groups, how the DA system functions in such social groups of animals, and its dysfunction causes compromises in the groups has remained less understood. Here we propose that alterations of DA signaling and associated genetic variants and behavioral phenotypes, which have been normally considered as "deficits" in investigation at an individual level, may not necessarily yield disadvantages, but even work advantageously, depending on social contexts in groups. This hypothesis could provide a novel insight into our understanding of the biological mechanisms of psychiatric disorders, and a potential explanation that disadvantageous phenotypes associated with DA deficits in psychiatric disorders have remained in humans through evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Neuroscience 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,929,013
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,488
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,786
of 264,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#39
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.