↓ Skip to main content

Switching modes in corticogenesis: mechanisms of neuronal subtype transitions and integration in the cerebral cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Switching modes in corticogenesis: mechanisms of neuronal subtype transitions and integration in the cerebral cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenichi Toma, Carina Hanashima

Abstract

Information processing in the cerebral cortex requires the activation of diverse neurons across layers and columns, which are established through the coordinated production of distinct neuronal subtypes and their placement along the three-dimensional axis. Over recent years, our knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms of the specification and integration of neuronal subtypes in the cerebral cortex has progressed rapidly. In this review, we address how the unique cytoarchitecture of the neocortex is established from a limited number of progenitors featuring neuronal identity transitions during development. We further illuminate the molecular mechanisms of the subtype-specific integration of these neurons into the cerebral cortex along the radial and tangential axis, and we discuss these key features to exemplify how neocortical circuit formation accomplishes economical connectivity while maintaining plasticity and evolvability to adapt to environmental changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 224 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 25%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 70 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 35 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,137
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,274
of 275,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#89
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.