You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of ROI selection on resting state functional connectivity: an individualized approach for resting state fMRI analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William S. Sohn, Kwangsun Yoo, Young-Beom Lee, Sang W. Seo, Duk L. Na, Yong Jeong |
| Abstract |
The differences in how our brain is connected are often thought to reflect the differences in our individual personalities and cognitive abilities. Individual differences in brain connectivity has long been recognized in the neuroscience community however it has yet to manifest itself in the methodology of resting state analysis. This is evident as previous studies use the same region of interest (ROIs) for all subjects. In this paper we demonstrate that the use of ROIs which are standardized across individuals leads to inaccurate calculations of functional connectivity. We also show that this problem can be addressed by taking an individualized approach by using subject-specific ROIs. Finally we show that ROI selection can affect the way we interpret our data by showing different changes in functional connectivity with aging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 49 | 26% |
| Psychology | 38 | 20% |
| Engineering | 15 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,474,477
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,365
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,647
of 275,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#47
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.