↓ Skip to main content

Promoting social plasticity in developmental disorders with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting social plasticity in developmental disorders with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo S. Boggio, Manish K. Asthana, Thiago L. Costa, Cláudia A. Valasek, Ana A. C. Osório

Abstract

Being socially connected directly impacts our basic needs and survival. People with deficits in social cognition might exhibit abnormal behaviors and face many challenges in our highly social-dependent world. These challenges and limitations are associated with a substantial economical and subjective impact. As many conditions where social cognition is affected are highly prevalent, more treatments have to be developed. Based on recent research, we review studies where non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques have been used to promote Social Plasticity in developmental disorders. We focused on three populations where non-invasive brain stimulation seems to be a promising approach in inducing social plasticity: Schizophrenia, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Williams Syndrome (WS). There are still very few studies directly evaluating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the social cognition of these populations. However, when considering the promising preliminary evidences presented in this review and the limited amount of clinical interventions available for treating social cognition deficits in these populations today, it is clear that the social neuroscientist arsenal may profit from non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for rehabilitation and promotion of social plasticity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Neuroscience 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,277,392
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,573
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,465
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#56
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.