↓ Skip to main content

Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
420 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Garrick Orchard, Ajinkya Jayawant, Gregory K. Cohen, Nitish Thakor

Abstract

Creating datasets for Neuromorphic Vision is a challenging task. A lack of available recordings from Neuromorphic Vision sensors means that data must typically be recorded specifically for dataset creation rather than collecting and labeling existing data. The task is further complicated by a desire to simultaneously provide traditional frame-based recordings to allow for direct comparison with traditional Computer Vision algorithms. Here we propose a method for converting existing Computer Vision static image datasets into Neuromorphic Vision datasets using an actuated pan-tilt camera platform. Moving the sensor rather than the scene or image is a more biologically realistic approach to sensing and eliminates timing artifacts introduced by monitor updates when simulating motion on a computer monitor. We present conversion of two popular image datasets (MNIST and Caltech101) which have played important roles in the development of Computer Vision, and we provide performance metrics on these datasets using spike-based recognition algorithms. This work contributes datasets for future use in the field, as well as results from spike-based algorithms against which future works can compare. Furthermore, by converting datasets already popular in Computer Vision, we enable more direct comparison with frame-based approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Student > Master 47 21%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 73 32%
Computer Science 61 27%
Neuroscience 16 7%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 56 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,547,684
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,537
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,425
of 274,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#30
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.