↓ Skip to main content

Criticality as a Set-Point for Adaptive Behavior in Neuromorphic Hardware

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Criticality as a Set-Point for Adaptive Behavior in Neuromorphic Hardware
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00449
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narayan Srinivasa, Nigel D. Stepp, Jose Cruz-Albrecht

Abstract

Neuromorphic hardware are designed by drawing inspiration from biology to overcome limitations of current computer architectures while forging the development of a new class of autonomous systems that can exhibit adaptive behaviors. Several designs in the recent past are capable of emulating large scale networks but avoid complexity in network dynamics by minimizing the number of dynamic variables that are supported and tunable in hardware. We believe that this is due to the lack of a clear understanding of how to design self-tuning complex systems. It has been widely demonstrated that criticality appears to be the default state of the brain and manifests in the form of spontaneous scale-invariant cascades of neural activity. Experiment, theory and recent models have shown that neuronal networks at criticality demonstrate optimal information transfer, learning and information processing capabilities that affect behavior. In this perspective article, we argue that understanding how large scale neuromorphic electronics can be designed to enable emergent adaptive behavior will require an understanding of how networks emulated by such hardware can self-tune local parameters to maintain criticality as a set-point. We believe that such capability will enable the design of truly scalable intelligent systems using neuromorphic hardware that embrace complexity in network dynamics rather than avoiding it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
United States 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 34 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 13%
Physics and Astronomy 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,005
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,792
of 11,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,681
of 395,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#59
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.