You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating Human Neurovascular Coupling Using Functional Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of Dynamic Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00467 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clément Huneau, Habib Benali, Hugues Chabriat |
| Abstract |
The mechanisms that link a transient neural activity to the corresponding increase of cerebral blood flow (CBF) are termed neurovascular coupling (NVC). They are possibly impaired at early stages of small vessel or neurodegenerative diseases. Investigation of NVC in humans has been made possible with the development of various neuroimaging techniques based on variations of local hemodynamics during neural activity. Specific dynamic models are currently used for interpreting these data that can include biophysical parameters related to NVC. After a brief review of the current knowledge about possible mechanisms acting in NVC we selected seven models with explicit integration of NVC found in the literature. All these models were described using the same procedure. We compared their physiological assumptions, mathematical formalism, and validation. In particular, we pointed out their strong differences in terms of complexity. Finally, we discussed their validity and their potential applications. These models may provide key information to investigate various aspects of NVC in human pathology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 65 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 15% |
| Engineering | 28 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,675
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,541
of 394,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#96
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.