↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Glutamate Toxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases—What is the Evidence?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
684 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Glutamate Toxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases—What is the Evidence?
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Lewerenz, Pamela Maher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 678 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 19%
Student > Bachelor 107 16%
Student > Master 89 13%
Researcher 69 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 88 13%
Unknown 166 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 144 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 85 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 45 7%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 200 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,334,982
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#598
of 11,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,980
of 398,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.