You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Models of Parkinson's Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shail A. Jagmag, Naveen Tripathi, Sunil D. Shukla, Sankar Maiti, Sukant Khurana |
| Abstract |
Parkinson's disease is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases. Animal models have contributed a large part to our understanding and therapeutics developed for treatment of PD. There are several more exhaustive reviews of literature that provide the initiated insights into the specific models; however a novel synthesis of the basic advantages and disadvantages of different models is much needed. Here we compare both neurotoxin based and genetic models while suggesting some novel avenues in PD modeling. We also highlight the problems faced and promises of all the mammalian models with the hope of providing a framework for comparison of various systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 440 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 12% |
| Researcher | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 9% |
| Unknown | 112 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 95 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 11% |
| Unknown | 129 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,684,140
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#843
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,021
of 402,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.