↓ Skip to main content

Thermal Regulation of the Brain—An Anatomical and Physiological Review for Clinical Neuroscientists

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thermal Regulation of the Brain—An Anatomical and Physiological Review for Clinical Neuroscientists
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huan Wang, Miri Kim, Kieran P. Normoyle, Daniel Llano

Abstract

Humans, like all mammals and birds, maintain a near constant core body temperature of 36-37.5°C over a broad range of environmental conditions and are thus referred to as endotherms. The evolution of the brain and its supporting structures in mammals and birds coincided with this development of endothermy. Despite the recognition that a more evolved and complicated brain with all of its temperature-dependent cerebral circuitry and neuronal processes would require more sophisticated thermal control mechanisms, the current understanding of brain temperature regulation remains limited. To optimize the development and maintenance of the brain in health and to accelerate its healing and restoration in illness, focused, and committed efforts are much needed to advance the fundamental understanding of brain temperature. To effectively study and examine brain temperature and its regulation, we must first understand relevant anatomical and physiological properties of thermoregulation in the head-neck regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Engineering 14 13%
Neuroscience 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,099,913
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,157
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,224
of 403,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#25
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.