↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Neurogenesis by Neurotrophins during Adulthood: Expected and Unexpected Roles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of Neurogenesis by Neurotrophins during Adulthood: Expected and Unexpected Roles
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marçal Vilar, Helena Mira

Abstract

The subventricular zone (SVZ) of the anterolateral ventricle and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampal dentate gyrus are the two main regions of the adult mammalian brain in which neurogenesis is maintained throughout life. Because alterations in adult neurogenesis appear to be a common hallmark of different neurodegenerative diseases, understanding the molecular mechanisms controlling adult neurogenesis is a focus of active research. Neurotrophic factors are a family of molecules that play critical roles in the survival and differentiation of neurons during development and in the control of neural plasticity in the adult. Several neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors have been implicated in the regulation of adult neurogenesis at different levels. Here, we review the current understanding of neurotrophin modulation of adult neurogenesis in both the SVZ and SGZ. We compile data supporting a variety of roles for neurotrophins/neurotrophin receptors in different scenarios, including both expected and unexpected functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 55 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 52 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 59 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,580,273
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#770
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,189
of 409,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.