↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Current Neuromorphic Approaches for Vision, Auditory, and Olfactory Sensors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Review of Current Neuromorphic Approaches for Vision, Auditory, and Olfactory Sensors
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anup Vanarse, Adam Osseiran, Alexander Rassau

Abstract

Conventional vision, auditory, and olfactory sensors generate large volumes of redundant data and as a result tend to consume excessive power. To address these shortcomings, neuromorphic sensors have been developed. These sensors mimic the neuro-biological architecture of sensory organs using aVLSI (analog Very Large Scale Integration) and generate asynchronous spiking output that represents sensing information in ways that are similar to neural signals. This allows for much lower power consumption due to an ability to extract useful sensory information from sparse captured data. The foundation for research in neuromorphic sensors was laid more than two decades ago, but recent developments in understanding of biological sensing and advanced electronics, have stimulated research on sophisticated neuromorphic sensors that provide numerous advantages over conventional sensors. In this paper, we review the current state-of-the-art in neuromorphic implementation of vision, auditory, and olfactory sensors and identify key contributions across these fields. Bringing together these key contributions we suggest a future research direction for further development of the neuromorphic sensing field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 52 35%
Computer Science 17 11%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Materials Science 10 7%
Physics and Astronomy 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,260,295
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,333
of 11,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,277
of 315,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#19
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.