↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular Vesicles and a Novel Form of Communication in the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular Vesicles and a Novel Form of Communication in the Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Basso, Valentina Bonetto

Abstract

In numerous neurodegenerative diseases, the interplay between neurons and glia modulates the outcome and progression of pathology. One particularly intriguing mode of interaction between neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes is characterized by the release of extracellular vesicles that transport proteins, lipids, and nucleotides from one cell to another. Notably, several proteins that cause disease, including the prion protein and mutant SOD1, have been detected in glia-derived extracellular vesicles and observed to fuse with neurons and trigger pathology in vitro. Here we review the structural and functional characterization of such extracellular vesicles in neuron-glia interactions. Furthermore, we discuss possible mechanisms of extracellular vesicle biogenesis and release from activated glia and microglia, and their effects on neurons. Given that exosomes, the smallest type of extracellular vesicles, have been reported to recognize specific cellular populations and act as carriers of very specialized cargo, a thorough analysis of these vesicles may aid in their engineering in vitro and targeted delivery in vivo, opening opportunities for therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 300 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 20%
Researcher 55 18%
Student > Master 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 22%
Neuroscience 58 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 74 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,035,659
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,132
of 11,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,898
of 315,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#16
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.