You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Traumatic Brain Injury Activation of the Adult Subventricular Zone Neurogenic Niche
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2016.00332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eun Hyuk Chang, Istvan Adorjan, Mayara V. Mundim, Bin Sun, Maria L. V. Dizon, Francis G. Szele |
| Abstract |
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in both civilian and military life, placing a large burden on survivors and society. However, with the recognition of neural stem cells in adult mammals, including humans, came the possibility to harness these cells for repair of damaged brain, whereas previously this was thought to be impossible. In this review, we focus on the rodent adult subventricular zone (SVZ), an important neurogenic niche within the mature brain in which neural stem cells continue to reside. We review how the SVZ is perturbed following various animal TBI models with regards to cell proliferation, emigration, survival, and differentiation, and we review specific molecules involved in these processes. Together, this information suggests next steps in attempting to translate knowledge from TBI animal models into human therapies for TBI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 28 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,111,395
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,402
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,450
of 381,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#48
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.