You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coordination Dynamics in Cognitive Neuroscience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2016.00397 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven L. Bressler, J. A. Scott Kelso |
| Abstract |
Many researchers and clinicians in cognitive neuroscience hold to a modular view of cognitive function in which the cerebral cortex operates by the activation of areas with circumscribed elementary cognitive functions. Yet an ongoing paradigm shift to a dynamic network perspective is underway. This new viewpoint treats cortical function as arising from the coordination dynamics within and between cortical regions. Cortical coordination dynamics arises due to the unidirectional influences imposed on a cortical area by inputs from other areas that project to it, combined with the projection reciprocity that characterizes cortical connectivity and gives rise to reentrant processing. As a result, cortical dynamics exhibits both segregative and integrative tendencies and gives rise to both cooperative and competitive relations within and between cortical areas that are hypothesized to underlie the emergence of cognition in brains. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 19% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 20% |
| Psychology | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,183,857
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,444
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,038
of 329,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#30
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.