You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Progress Beyond Communication and Control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2016.00530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Blankertz, Laura Acqualagna, Sven Dähne, Stefan Haufe, Matthias Schultze-Kraft, Irene Sturm, Marija Ušćumlic, Markus A. Wenzel, Gabriel Curio, Klaus-Robert Müller |
| Abstract |
The combined effect of fundamental results about neurocognitive processes and advancements in decoding mental states from ongoing brain signals has brought forth a whole range of potential neurotechnological applications. In this article, we review our developments in this area and put them into perspective. These examples cover a wide range of maturity levels with respect to their applicability. While we assume we are still a long way away from integrating Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in general interaction with computers, or from implementing neurotechnological measures in safety-critical workplaces, results have already now been obtained involving a BCI as research tool. In this article, we discuss the reasons why, in some of the prospective application domains, considerable effort is still required to make the systems ready to deal with the full complexity of the real world. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 60 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 38 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 15% |
| Psychology | 18 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,540,361
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,532
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,866
of 415,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#27
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.