↓ Skip to main content

The Eye As a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
37 X users

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Eye As a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00536
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremiah K. H. Lim, Qiao-Xin Li, Zheng He, Algis J. Vingrys, Vickie H. Y. Wong, Nicolas Currier, Jamie Mullen, Bang V. Bui, Christine T. O. Nguyen

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder resulting in dementia and eventual death. It is the leading cause of dementia and the number of cases are projected to rise in the next few decades. Pathological hallmarks of AD include the presence of hyperphosphorylated tau and amyloid protein deposition. Currently, these pathological biomarkers are detected either through cerebrospinal fluid analysis, brain imaging or post-mortem. Though effective, these methods are not widely available due to issues such as the difficulty in acquiring samples, lack of infrastructure or high cost. Given that the eye possesses clear optics and shares many neural and vascular similarities to the brain, it offers a direct window to cerebral pathology. These unique characteristics lend itself to being a relatively inexpensive biomarker for AD which carries the potential for wide implementation. The development of ocular biomarkers can have far implications in the discovery of treatments which can improve the quality of lives of patients. In this review, we consider the current evidence for ocular biomarkers in AD and explore potential future avenues of research in this area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 339 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Researcher 50 15%
Student > Master 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 87 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 17%
Neuroscience 45 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 8%
Engineering 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 103 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,228,102
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#538
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,623
of 417,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.