↓ Skip to main content

Attention, in and Out: Scalp-Level and Intracranial EEG Correlates of Interoception and Exteroception

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attention, in and Out: Scalp-Level and Intracranial EEG Correlates of Interoception and Exteroception
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Indira García-Cordero, Sol Esteves, Ezequiel P. Mikulan, Eugenia Hesse, Fabricio H. Baglivo, Walter Silva, María del Carmen García, Esteban Vaucheret, Carlos Ciraolo, Hernando S. García, Federico Adolfi, Marcos Pietto, Eduar Herrera, Agustina Legaz, Facundo Manes, Adolfo M. García, Mariano Sigman, Tristán A. Bekinschtein, Agustín Ibáñez, Lucas Sedeño

Abstract

Interoception, the monitoring of visceral signals, is often presumed to engage attentional mechanisms specifically devoted to inner bodily sensing. In fact, most standardized interoceptive tasks require directing attention to internal signals. However, most studies in the field have failed to compare attentional modulations between internally- and externally-driven processes, thus probing blind to the specificity of the former. Here we address this issue through a multidimensional approach combining behavioral measures, analyses of event-related potentials and functional connectivity via high-density electroencephalography, and intracranial recordings. In Study 1, 50 healthy volunteers performed a heartbeat detection task as we recorded modulations of the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) in three conditions: exteroception, basal interoception (also termed interoceptive accuracy), and post-feedback interoception (sometimes called interoceptive learning). In Study 2, to evaluate whether key interoceptive areas (posterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, amygdala, and somatosensory cortex) were differentially modulated by externally- and internally-driven processes, we analyzed human intracranial recordings with depth electrodes in these regions. This unique technique provides a very fine grained spatio-temporal resolution compared to other techniques, such as EEG or fMRI. We found that both interoceptive conditions in Study 1 yielded greater HEP amplitudes than the exteroceptive one. In addition, connectivity analysis showed that post-feedback interoception, relative to basal interoception, involved enhanced long-distance connections linking frontal and posterior regions. Moreover, results from Study 2 showed a differentiation between oscillations during basal interoception (broadband: 35-110 Hz) and exteroception (1-35 Hz) in the insula, the amygdala, the somatosensory cortex, and the inferior frontal gyrus. In sum, this work provides convergent evidence for the specificity and dynamics of attentional mechanisms involved in interoception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 27%
Neuroscience 48 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,809,771
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,653
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,740
of 325,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#35
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.