↓ Skip to main content

Cross Talk: The Microbiota and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
225 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
571 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross Talk: The Microbiota and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00490
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Kelly, Chiara Minuto, John F. Cryan, Gerard Clarke, Timothy G. Dinan

Abstract

Humans evolved within a microbial ecosystem resulting in an interlinked physiology. The gut microbiota can signal to the brain via the immune system, the vagus nerve or other host-microbe interactions facilitated by gut hormones, regulation of tryptophan metabolism and microbial metabolites such as short chain fatty acids (SCFA), to influence brain development, function and behavior. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may play a role in shaping cognitive networks encompassing emotional and social domains in neurodevelopmental disorders. Drawing upon pre-clinical and clinical evidence, we review the potential role of the gut microbiota in the origins and development of social and emotional domains related to Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and schizophrenia. Small preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated gut microbiota alterations in both ASD and schizophrenia compared to healthy controls. However, we await the further development of mechanistic insights, together with large scale longitudinal clinical trials, that encompass a systems level dimensional approach, to investigate whether promising pre-clinical and initial clinical findings lead to clinical relevance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 225 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 571 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 16%
Researcher 87 15%
Student > Master 69 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 102 18%
Unknown 131 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 85 15%
Neuroscience 74 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 69 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 5%
Other 111 19%
Unknown 151 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#227,803
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#99
of 11,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,753
of 324,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.