↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Molecular Chaperones and Neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Molecular Chaperones and Neurodegeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cintia Roodveldt, Tiago F. Outeiro, Janice E. A. Braun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Chemistry 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,151,813
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,631
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,405
of 333,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#61
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.