↓ Skip to main content

A Sub-millimeter, Inductively Powered Neural Stimulator

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Sub-millimeter, Inductively Powered Neural Stimulator
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel K. Freeman, Jonathan M. O'Brien, Parshant Kumar, Brian Daniels, Reed A. Irion, Louis Shraytah, Brett K. Ingersoll, Andrew P. Magyar, Andrew Czarnecki, Jesse Wheeler, Jonathan R. Coppeta, Michael P. Abban, Ronald Gatzke, Shelley I. Fried, Seung Woo Lee, Amy E. Duwel, Jonathan J. Bernstein, Alik S. Widge, Ana Hernandez-Reynoso, Aswini Kanneganti, Mario I. Romero-Ortega, Stuart F. Cogan

Abstract

Wireless neural stimulators are being developed to address problems associated with traditional lead-based implants. However, designing wireless stimulators on the sub-millimeter scale (<1 mm3) is challenging. As device size shrinks, it becomes difficult to deliver sufficient wireless power to operate the device. Here, we present a sub-millimeter, inductively powered neural stimulator consisting only of a coil to receive power, a capacitor to tune the resonant frequency of the receiver, and a diode to rectify the radio-frequency signal to produce neural excitation. By replacing any complex receiver circuitry with a simple rectifier, we have reduced the required voltage levels that are needed to operate the device from 0.5 to 1 V (e.g., for CMOS) to ~0.25-0.5 V. This reduced voltage allows the use of smaller receive antennas for power, resulting in a device volume of 0.3-0.5 mm3. The device was encapsulated in epoxy, and successfully passed accelerated lifetime tests in 80°C saline for 2 weeks. We demonstrate a basic proof-of-concept using stimulation with tens of microamps of current delivered to the sciatic nerve in rat to produce a motor response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Professor 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 49 46%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Materials Science 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,062,958
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,165
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,006
of 446,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#20
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.