↓ Skip to main content

Classifying the Perceptual Interpretations of a Bistable Image Using EEG and Artificial Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classifying the Perceptual Interpretations of a Bistable Image Using EEG and Artificial Neural Networks
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander E. Hramov, Vladimir A. Maksimenko, Svetlana V. Pchelintseva, Anastasiya E. Runnova, Vadim V. Grubov, Vyacheslav Yu. Musatov, Maksim O. Zhuravlev, Alexey A. Koronovskii, Alexander N. Pisarchik

Abstract

In order to classify different human brain states related to visual perception of ambiguous images, we use an artificial neural network (ANN) to analyze multichannel EEG. The classifier built on the basis of a multilayer perceptron achieves up to 95% accuracy in classifying EEG patterns corresponding to two different interpretations of the Necker cube. The important feature of our classifier is that trained on one subject it can be used for the classification of EEG traces of other subjects. This result suggests the existence of common features in the EEG structure associated with distinct interpretations of bistable objects. We firmly believe that the significance of our results is not limited to visual perception of the Necker cube images; the proposed experimental approach and developed computational technique based on ANN can also be applied to study and classify different brain states using neurophysiological data recordings. This may give new directions for future research in the field of cognitive and pathological brain activity, and for the development of brain-computer interfaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 13%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Engineering 5 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 30 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,932,988
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,491
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,748
of 445,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#54
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.