You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding Negative Results in tDCS Research: The Importance of Neural Targeting and Cortical Engagement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2017.00707 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aurore Thibaut, Ross Zafonte, Leslie R. Morse, Felipe Fregni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,611,284
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,624
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,040
of 443,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#23
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.