↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila melanogaster White Mutant w1118 Undergo Retinal Degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drosophila melanogaster White Mutant w1118 Undergo Retinal Degeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00732
Pubmed ID
Authors

María José Ferreiro, Coralia Pérez, Mariana Marchesano, Santiago Ruiz, Angel Caputi, Pedro Aguilera, Rosa Barrio, Rafael Cantera

Abstract

Key scientific discoveries have resulted from genetic studies of Drosophila melanogaster, using a multitude of transgenic fly strains, the majority of which are constructed in a genetic background containing mutations in the white gene. Here we report that white mutant flies from w1118 strain undergo retinal degeneration. We observed also that w1118 mutants have progressive loss of climbing ability, shortened life span, as well as impaired resistance to various forms of stress. Retinal degeneration was abolished by transgenic expression of mini-white+ in the white null background w1118 . We conclude that beyond the classical eye-color phenotype, mutations in Drosophila white gene could impair several biological functions affecting parameters like mobility, life span and stress tolerance. Consequently, we suggest caution and attentiveness during the interpretation of old experiments employing white mutant flies and when planning new ones, especially within the research field of neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. We also encourage that the use of w1118 strain as a wild-type control should be avoided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 23%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 82 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 14%
Neuroscience 25 12%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 86 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,219,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#537
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,889
of 450,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#13
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.