↓ Skip to main content

Challenges for Alzheimer's Disease Therapy: Insights from Novel Mechanisms Beyond Memory Defects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges for Alzheimer's Disease Therapy: Insights from Novel Mechanisms Beyond Memory Defects
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudimar L. Frozza, Mychael V. Lourenco, Fernanda G. De Felice

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia in late life, will become even more prevalent by midcentury, constituting a major global health concern with huge implications for individuals and society. Despite scientific breakthroughs during the past decades that have expanded our knowledge on the cellular and molecular bases of AD, therapies that effectively halt disease progression are still lacking, and focused efforts are needed to address this public health challenge. Because AD is classically recognized as a disease of memory, studies have mainly focused on investigating memory-associated brain defects. However, compelling evidence has indicated that additional brain regions, not classically linked to memory, are also affected in the course of disease. In this review, we outline the current understanding of key pathophysiological mechanisms in AD and their clinical manifestation. We also highlight how considering the complex nature of AD pathogenesis, and exploring repurposed drug approaches can pave the road toward the development of novel therapeutics for AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 321 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 16%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 110 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 12%
Neuroscience 35 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 124 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#952,086
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#407
of 11,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,222
of 448,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#16
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.