↓ Skip to main content

A Noise Filtering Algorithm for Event-Based Asynchronous Change Detection Image Sensors on TrueNorth and Its Implementation on TrueNorth

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Noise Filtering Algorithm for Event-Based Asynchronous Change Detection Image Sensors on TrueNorth and Its Implementation on TrueNorth
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vandana Padala, Arindam Basu, Garrick Orchard

Abstract

Asynchronous event-based sensors, or "silicon retinae," are a new class of vision sensors inspired by biological vision systems. The output of these sensors often contains a significant number of noise events along with the signal. Filtering these noise events is a common preprocessing step before using the data for tasks such as tracking and classification. This paper presents a novel spiking neural network-based approach to filtering noise events from data captured by an Asynchronous Time-based Image Sensor on a neuromorphic processor, the IBM TrueNorth Neurosynaptic System. The significant contribution of this work is that it demonstrates our proposed filtering algorithm outperforms the traditional nearest neighbor noise filter in achieving higher signal to noise ratio (~10 dB higher) and retaining the events related to signal (~3X more). In addition, for our envisioned application of object tracking and classification under some parameter settings, it can also generate some of the missing events in the spatial neighborhood of the signal for all classes of moving objects in the data which are unattainable using the nearest neighbor filter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 37%
Computer Science 9 20%
Mathematics 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,672
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,532
of 347,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#206
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.