↓ Skip to main content

Stress in Regulation of GABA Amygdala System and Relevance to Neuropsychiatric Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stress in Regulation of GABA Amygdala System and Relevance to Neuropsychiatric Diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Jie, Guanghao Yin, Wei Yang, Modi Yang, Shuohui Gao, Jiayin Lv, Bingjin Li

Abstract

The amygdala is an almond-shaped nucleus located deep and medially within the temporal lobe and is thought to play a crucial role in the regulation of emotional processes. GABAergic neurotransmission inhibits the amygdala and prevents us from generating inappropriate emotional and behavioral responses. Stress may cause the reduction of the GABAergic interneuronal network and the development of neuropsychological diseases. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence investigating the possible mechanisms underlying GABAergic control of the amygdala and its interaction with acute and chronic stress. Taken together, this study may contribute to future progress in finding new approaches to reverse the attenuation of GABAergic neurotransmission induced by stress in the amygdala.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 61 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 64 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,536,333
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#744
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,579
of 341,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#22
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.