↓ Skip to main content

Task-Evoked Dynamic Network Analysis Through Hidden Markov Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Task-Evoked Dynamic Network Analysis Through Hidden Markov Modeling
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00603
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Quinn, Diego Vidaurre, Romesh Abeysuriya, Robert Becker, Anna C. Nobre, Mark W. Woolrich

Abstract

Complex thought and behavior arise through dynamic recruitment of large-scale brain networks. The signatures of this process may be observable in electrophysiological data; yet robust modeling of rapidly changing functional network structure on rapid cognitive timescales remains a considerable challenge. Here, we present one potential solution using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), which are able to identify brain states characterized by engaging distinct functional networks that reoccur over time. We show how the HMM can be inferred on continuous, parcellated source-space Magnetoencephalography (MEG) task data in an unsupervised manner, without any knowledge of the task timings. We apply this to a freely available MEG dataset in which participants completed a face perception task, and reveal task-dependent HMM states that represent whole-brain dynamic networks transiently bursting at millisecond time scales as cognition unfolds. The analysis pipeline demonstrates a general way in which the HMM can be used to do a statistically valid whole-brain, group-level task analysis on MEG task data, which could be readily adapted to a wide range of task-based studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 51 27%
Psychology 20 11%
Engineering 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Computer Science 10 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 65 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,312,240
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,375
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,418
of 344,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#40
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.