You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of Electroencephalography for the Study of Gain–Loss Asymmetry in Intertemporal Decision-Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00984 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lei Zhao, Zuoli Shi, Qian Zheng, Huadong Chu, Lin Xu, Fengpei Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 39% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,992,387
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,984
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,521
of 443,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#153
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.