↓ Skip to main content

Experimental and Computational Methods for the Study of Cerebral Organoids: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental and Computational Methods for the Study of Cerebral Organoids: A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Poli, Chiara Magliaro, Arti Ahluwalia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 33 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 14%
Engineering 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 72 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,160,941
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,432
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,927
of 366,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#88
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.