↓ Skip to main content

Portable Devices to Induce Lucid Dreams—Are They Reliable?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Portable Devices to Induce Lucid Dreams—Are They Reliable?
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sérgio A. Mota-Rolim, Achilleas Pavlou, George C. Nascimento, John Fontenele-Araujo, Sidarta Ribeiro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 21%
Neuroscience 11 16%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 28 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#242,686
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#105
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,985
of 364,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.